Category: (Book)
10 new, starting at $5.59
10 used, starting at $5.59
A survey of the quirks and quandaries of the English language,
focusing on our strange and wonderful grammar
Why do we say “I am reading a catalog” instead of “I read a
catalog”? Why do we say “do” at all? Is the way we speak a
reflection of our cultural values? Delving into these provocative
topics and more, Our Magnificent Bastard Language distills
hundreds of years of fascinating lore into one lively
history.
Covering such turning points as the little-known Celtic and Welsh
influences on English, the impact of the Viking raids and the
Norman Conquest, and the Germanic invasions that started it all
during the fifth century ad, John McWhorter narrates this colorful
evolution with vigor. Drawing on revolutionary genetic and
linguistic research as well as a cache of remarkable trivia about
the origins of English words and syntax patterns, Our
Magnificent Bastard Tongue ultimately demonstrates the
arbitrary, maddening nature of English— and its ironic simplicity
due to its role as a streamlined lingua franca during the early
formation of Britain. This is the book that language aficionados
worldwide have been waiting for (and no, it’s not a sin to end a
sentence with a preposition).
Our Magnificent Bastard TongueReviewed by Sue, 2010-02-10
I first learned about John McWhorter and this book on PBS, and I immediately bought it. McWhorter is a wonderful writer, and the book is sneaky in the way that it imparts rather abstract knowledge in a delightful conversational style. Though McWhorter can be a little long-winded at times, I really enjoyed this book, and I consider it an important reference for my studies in linguistics. I will be buying more of his published works. 4/5 stars. Thanks for reading.
How English Lost Its EndingsReviewed by Michael Gunther, 2010-01-06
In this book, linguist John McWhorter describes how, and why,
English is so oddly different from rest of its relatives in the
Germanic family. These grammatical differences include the use of
"do" in questions ("Do you think that he will write a review?"),
the use of "-ing" to indicate present tense ("He is writing a
review"), and a drastic paring-back of the word endings for case,
number, and gender. His theory is that these and other
peculiarities can be traced back to the way that English and its
predecessors rubbed up against other languages in the course of
history.
First, circa 500 BC, Proto-Germanic itself lost numerous case
endings in contact with Punic-speaking voyagers in Denmark. A
thousand years later (449 AD), Germanic invaders colonized an
England that had already been settled by Celtic people (Celtic
remnants today include the Welsh), so that Old English came to
include some Celtic in its makeup. Finally, during the 8th century,
Viking colonizers, in learning to speak the Old English of their
newly adopted home, rubbed off most of its grammatical endings to
produce Middle English. Although McWhorter's story ends there, he
does mention that Norman French later added whole boatloads of new
words, and that is how we got the English that we have today.
On the minus side, the author spends a lot of time beating
long-dead horses (grammar police, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis). More
controversially, and as McWhorter himself admits very openly, his
story is not one that is accepted by the majority of historical
linguists today. The basic problem is that it is hard to match up
changes in written English to the dates that the theory requires.
Be that as it may, it is exciting to follow along with the evidence
and arguments on such an interesting topic. The author's writing is
clear and amusing, such that non-specialist readers will be able to
follow the book easily. It contains a lot of detail, including
examples from many other languages, and is most recommended for
readers who have a pretty keen interest in the history of the
English language.
OK BookReviewed by Student Guy, 2009-12-29
This book was a nice followup to my bio class, where we learned
about the evolution of language. I found out some interesting stuff
about the forces affecting English, and was fairly fascinated in
reading about the question of whether grammar restricts thought or
not. I think language overall is pretty interesting, because it
really doesn't make sense...but at the same time it follows logical
rules.
The book I thought explained itself well. It was kind of repetitive
at some parts, but I thought the repetition help to keep things
fresh in the mind, even if a bit tiresome.
I definitely learned the author's main points, and some other
interesting tidbits of info. That's good, because I was interested
in the author's specific answers information from the outset. Nice
and concise, good-to-know info, in a short read. Plus it gave me a
better understanding of what I learned in school. And now I'm using
his book as a starting point for a project. Can't complain about
that.
Additionally, I think it would be useful if the author were more
specific when talking about how grammar doesn't determine thought.
Of course, the fact that the Japanese aren't prevented from
thinking of the future because their language lacks a future tense.
Great point, author. However, language itself is very influential
on thought (depending on how you phrase sentences, you can
influence people at a very deep level). I think, literally, just a
sentence saying this (that while grammars of different languages do
not make the speakers different in thought, the way one uses
language is very influential) would've been nice. I suppose that's
very obvious, though... haha sorry.
A nearly perfect book about a fun topicReviewed by R. L. Greene, 2009-12-16
I'm a language book nerd from way back, and familiar with the
issues McWhorter tackles in this book - the odd usage in English of
recruiting "do" as an auxiliary verb ("Do you like fish?"), and the
odd present-progressive ("I am writing a review.") Nonetheless, I
learned a lot new here. Both of these usages are rare around the
world, very rare. McWhorter does a good job of explaining the
scholarly debate, and his own view (the influence of Welsh and
Cornish), but the book reads breezily and easily, for all the
erudition. (In fact the only slight criticism I'd make is that it
reads a bit too breezily at times, as if McWhorter is worried he's
going to turn people off being too clever and too technical for too
long. Not a problem.)
After this main argument, the book goes on to the Viking and Norman
influences on English and some other topics. If you like either
language or history, it's fun. If you like both, more fun still.
A hard read with a snappy titleReviewed by John Cain, 2009-11-28
I bought the book because it was paired with Alphabet Juice by Roy
Blount Jr. I know who Roy Blount is and I thought if the book was
packaged with his book for a discount perhaps they would be
similiar.
I was wrong, terribly wrong.
Blount's book is always witty and entertaining and often
informative. This book is packed with information and opinions but
seldom witty or entertaining. I now know more about the infinitive
"to do" than I ever did before but have no greater interest in it
than I ever did before.
This is one book you should read a few pages of before buying it.
You may find the writing and the topic interesting, but for me from
tthe first chapter onward it was a labor to read; tedious but
interesting like a guest who has brought travel pictures of a place
I've never been to but am mildly intrested in.